The White House spoke on Friday saying it was still confident of winning
congressional approval for the Iran nuclear deal, despite an influential
senator's announcement that he will vote against it.The
announcement from Senator Chuck Schumer "was not particularly surprising
to anyone here at the White House", spokesperson Josh Earnest said.
"It's
not new, and this is a difference of opinion that President Obama and
Senator Schumer have had dating all the back to 2003."
He said
that Schumer's decision did not alter the White House's confidence that
it will be able to mobilise a majority of Democrats in both the House
and the Senate in support of the deal.
Schumer,
a Democrat from New York and a leading Jewish voice in Congress, said
he would vote no because he believes Iran will not change, and under the
agreement it "will be able to achieve its dual goals of eliminating
sanctions while ultimately retaining its nuclear and non-nuclear power".
He
said it would be better to keep US sanctions in place, strengthen them,
enforce secondary sanctions on other nations "and pursue the
hard-trodden path of diplomacy once more, difficult as it may be".
Schumer
specifically referred to what he said were "serious weaknesses" in the
first 10 years after the agreement's implementation. Those flaws, he
said, include the inability of the United States to demand inspections
of Iranian nuclear facilities unilaterally and a 24-day delay before
inspections may start.
Schumer said that he spent weeks reading
the agreement, reached July 14 between six world powers and Iran after
years of negotiations.
"After deep study, careful thought and
considerable soul-searching, I have decided I must oppose the agreement
and will vote yes on a motion of disapproval," he said in a statement.
Schumer
announced his intention to vote no despite Obama's warning that it
would be a historic mistake to squander the opportunity to peacefully
rein in Iran's nuclear ambitions. Obama said Congress would accelerate
Iran's pathway to a bomb if it rejects the deal.
Demand inspections
Schumer
said he was troubled that inspections are not permitted "anywhere,
anytime" by the agreement, and he said the 24-day delay "would hinder
our ability to determine precisely what was being done at that site".
He
said it was even more troubling that the United States can not demand
inspections unilaterally. The deal requires a majority of an
eight-member joint commission.
Assuming that China, Russia and
Iran will not co-operate, he said, inspections would require the votes
of all three European members as well as the EU representative.
"It
is reasonable to fear that, once the Europeans become entangled in
lucrative economic relations with Iran, they may well be inclined not to
rock the boat by voting to allow inspections," Schumer said.
He
complained that the so-called snapback provisions in the agreement,
which are designed to quickly reimplement sanctions against Iran, seem
cumbersome and difficult to use.
Despite his pledge to vote no, Schumer gave "tremendous credit" to Obama for his work on the issue.
Schumer's
announcement came after diplomats from the other countries involved in
the negotiations - Germany, France, China, Russia and Britain - briefed
25 Democratic senators on the deal.
A top German official, who spoke on Thursday with reporters, warned of a "nightmare" if Congress were to reject the deal.
"The
option of going back to negotiations is close to zero," said Philipp
Ackermann, Berlin's deputy ambassador to the United States.
Ackermann said a rejection of the deal would empower hardliners in Tehran who insist the United States cannot be trusted.
"These
people will say it's useless to negotiate" with the outside world, he
said, in comments that the German embassy in Washington confirmed to
dpa.
Members of Congress on Friday left Washington for a four-week break. They have until September 17 to weigh in on the agreement.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Write comments